The house is let, and a lot of trade copy implies a legal duty to fit a security screen that does not exist.
Smithfield is 91.0 percent separate houses, 2,103 of them, against 74.8 percent for Queensland, and 32.2 percent of occupied dwellings here are rented against 33.1 percent statewide. Those two figures bound each other: a rental share just under the state rate attached to an almost entirely detached housing stock puts between a quarter and a third of the houses here in someone else's hands, which is a different job from letting units. The Residential Tenancies Authority is direct about what the law reaches. Minimum housing standards require functioning locks or latches on all external doors and windows that can be reached without a ladder, and premises that are weatherproof, structurally sound, in good repair and free from vermin, damp and mould. Where an owner has installed additional security measures such as a security screen or grilles, the property still has to meet the standard by having a functioning lock or latch. A screen is not a lock. We do not tell an owner that the law requires a screen, because it does not. We make screens to measure where an owner wants them, and we replace the lock cylinders, complete locks and latching hardware that have stopped working, which is the part the standard actually reaches. If a legislative citation is wanted, the standards sit in Schedule 6 of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Regulation 2025.






